Celeron 7305 vs N4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4100
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.54
Celeron 7305
2022
5 cores / 5 threads, 15 Watt
1.56
+1.3%

Celeron 7305 outperforms Celeron N4100 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4100 and Celeron 7305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21322123
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency24.319.85
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Alder Lake-U (2022)
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)23 February 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4100 and Celeron 7305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads45
Base clock speed1.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.1 GHz
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache256 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature105 deg C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4100 and Celeron 7305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4100 and Celeron 7305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N4100 and Celeron 7305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4100 and Celeron 7305 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4100 and Celeron 7305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel Processors
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency700 MHz1.1 GHz
Execution Units1248

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4100 and Celeron 7305 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4100 and Celeron 7305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4100 and Celeron 7305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.44.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4100 and Celeron 7305.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes620
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4100 1.54
Celeron 7305 1.56
+1.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4100 2453
Celeron 7305 2471
+0.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.54 1.56
Integrated graphics card 0.87 5.58
Recency 11 December 2017 23 February 2022
Physical cores 4 5
Threads 4 5
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron N4100 has 150% lower power consumption.

Celeron 7305, on the other hand, has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score, 541.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, and 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron N4100 and Celeron 7305.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4100 and Celeron 7305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4100
Celeron N4100
Intel Celeron 7305
Celeron 7305

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 432 votes

Rate Celeron N4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 143 votes

Rate Celeron 7305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4100 or Celeron 7305, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.