3015Ce vs Celeron N4100
Aggregate performance score
Celeron N4100 outperforms 3015Ce by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N4100 and 3015Ce processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2132 | 2265 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) |
Power efficiency | 24.31 | 20.83 |
Architecture codename | Goldmont Plus (2017) | Pollock (Zen) (2020) |
Release date | 11 December 2017 (7 years ago) | 4 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N4100 and 3015Ce basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Multiplier | 11 | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 192 KB |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105 deg C | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N4100 and 3015Ce compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | FCBGA1090 | FT5 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4100 and 3015Ce. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N4100 and 3015Ce technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | - |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4100 and 3015Ce are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4100 and 3015Ce. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz) |
Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 700 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4100 and 3015Ce integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4100 and 3015Ce integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N4100 and 3015Ce integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4100 and 3015Ce.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
WebXPRT 3
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.54 | 1.32 |
Integrated graphics card | 0.87 | 2.98 |
Recency | 11 December 2017 | 4 August 2020 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Celeron N4100 has a 16.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.
3015Ce, on the other hand, has 242.5% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 2 years.
The Celeron N4100 is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015Ce in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4100 and 3015Ce, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.