Xeon W-1390 vs Celeron N4020

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4020
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.97
Xeon W-1390
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
15.05
+1452%

Xeon W-1390 outperforms Celeron N4020 by a whopping 1452% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4020 and Xeon W-1390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2488468
Place by popularity94not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data64.88
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Gemini Lakeno data
Power efficiency15.2217.71
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Rocket Lake-S (2021)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$494

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4020 and Xeon W-1390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate15 MHz8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data276 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4020 and Xeon W-1390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4020 and Xeon W-1390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N4020 and Xeon W-1390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4020 and Xeon W-1390 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4020 and Xeon W-1390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data50 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel UHD Graphics P750
Max video memory8 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency650 MHz1.3 GHz
Execution Units1232
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4020 and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4020 and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4020 and Xeon W-1390 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.44.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4020 and Xeon W-1390.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes620
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4020 0.97
Xeon W-1390 15.05
+1452%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4020 1548
Xeon W-1390 23902
+1444%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 15.05
Integrated graphics card 0.87 4.56
Recency 4 November 2019 6 May 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 80 Watt

Celeron N4020 has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-1390, on the other hand, has a 1451.5% higher aggregate performance score, 424.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Xeon W-1390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4020 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N4020 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-1390 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4020 and Xeon W-1390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4020
Celeron N4020
Intel Xeon W-1390
Xeon W-1390

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1794 votes

Rate Celeron N4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-1390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4020 or Xeon W-1390, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.