Trace: try redirect_from
Trace: select _id, title from ss_cpu where redirect_to=5062
Ryzen 7 4750U vs Celeron N4020
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 7 4750U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2417 | not rated |
Place by popularity | 47 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Gemini Lake | no data |
Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
Release date | 4 November 2019 (4 years ago) | 7 May 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 7 4750U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Die size | no data | 156 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 9,800 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 7 4750U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1090 | FP6 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 7 4750U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Status | Discontinued | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 7 4750U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | - |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 7 4750U are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 7 4750U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-4266 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 650 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 7 4750U integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 7 4750U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@30Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 7 4750U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 7 4750U.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.87 | 4.50 |
Recency | 4 November 2019 | 7 May 2020 |
Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
Threads | 2 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
Celeron N4020 has 150% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 4750U, on the other hand, has 417.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 months, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 7 4750U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 7 4750U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.