Xeon W-3345 vs Celeron N4000

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4000
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.96
Xeon W-3345
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 250 Watt
29.86
+3010%

Xeon W-3345 outperforms Celeron N4000 by a whopping 3010% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4000 and Xeon W-3345 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2506156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency14.5910.89
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4000 and Xeon W-3345 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache112 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 deg Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4000 and Xeon W-3345 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1090FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4000 and Xeon W-3345. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N4000 and Xeon W-3345 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4000 and Xeon W-3345 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4000 and Xeon W-3345. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4000 and Xeon W-3345 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4000 and Xeon W-3345 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4000 and Xeon W-3345 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4000 and Xeon W-3345.

PCIe version2.04
PCI Express lanes664
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4000 0.96
Xeon W-3345 29.86
+3010%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4000 1472
Xeon W-3345 45694
+3004%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 29.86
Recency 11 December 2017 29 July 2021
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 250 Watt

Celeron N4000 has 4066.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3345, on the other hand, has a 3010.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3345 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N4000 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3345 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4000 and Xeon W-3345, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4000
Celeron N4000
Intel Xeon W-3345
Xeon W-3345

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 888 votes

Rate Celeron N4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon W-3345 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4000 or Xeon W-3345, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.