i9-10900KF vs Celeron N4000

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4000
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.96
Core i9-10900KF
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
14.72
+1433%

Core i9-10900KF outperforms Celeron N4000 by a whopping 1433% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4000 and Core i9-10900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2506510
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.34
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency14.5910.74
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$509

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4000 and Core i9-10900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache112 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 deg C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4000 and Core i9-10900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1090FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4000 and Core i9-10900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+

Security technologies

Celeron N4000 and Core i9-10900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4000 and Core i9-10900KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4000 and Core i9-10900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s45.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600N/A
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4000 and Core i9-10900KF integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4000 and Core i9-10900KF integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4000 and Core i9-10900KF integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4000 and Core i9-10900KF.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4000 0.96
i9-10900KF 14.72
+1433%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4000 1472
i9-10900KF 22523
+1430%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N4000 325
i9-10900KF 1762
+442%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N4000 528
i9-10900KF 9016
+1608%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 14.72
Recency 11 December 2017 30 April 2020
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 20
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron N4000 has 1983.3% lower power consumption.

i9-10900KF, on the other hand, has a 1433.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

The Core i9-10900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N4000 is a notebook processor while Core i9-10900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4000 and Core i9-10900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4000
Celeron N4000
Intel Core i9-10900KF
Core i9-10900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 889 votes

Rate Celeron N4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 312 votes

Rate Core i9-10900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4000 or Core i9-10900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.