Celeron U3600 vs N4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4000
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.93
+158%
Celeron U3600
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.36

Celeron N4000 outperforms Celeron U3600 by a whopping 158% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4000 and Celeron U3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25133032
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency14.671.89
Architecture codenameGoldmont Plus (2017)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)11 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4000 and Celeron U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier119
L1 cache112 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB512 KB
L3 cache4 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 deg C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4000 and Celeron U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1090BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4000 and Celeron U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Response-no data
PAEno data36 Bit
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Celeron N4000 and Celeron U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4000 and Celeron U3600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4000 and Celeron U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3-800
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequency650 MHz500 MHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4000 and Celeron U3600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4000 and Celeron U3600 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4000 and Celeron U3600 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4000 and Celeron U3600.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4000 0.93
+158%
Celeron U3600 0.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4000 1472
+154%
Celeron U3600 579

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 0.36
Recency 11 December 2017 11 January 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 18 Watt

Celeron N4000 has a 158.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron U3600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4000 and Celeron U3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4000
Celeron N4000
Intel Celeron U3600
Celeron U3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 913 votes

Rate Celeron N4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Celeron U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4000 or Celeron U3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.