A4-7300 vs Celeron N3450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3450
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.25
+30.2%
A4-7300
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.96

Celeron N3450 outperforms A4-7300 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3450 and A4-7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23112504
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency19.731.40
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)August 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3450 and A4-7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4 GHz
Multiplier11no data
L1 cacheno data96 KB
L2 cache2 MB1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3450 and A4-7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1296FM2
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3450 and A4-7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3450 and A4-7300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3450 and A4-7300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3450 and A4-7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 500AMD Radeon HD 8470D
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data192
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3450 and A4-7300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3450 and A4-7300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+DirectX® 11
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3450 and A4-7300.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3450 1.25
+30.2%
A4-7300 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3450 1983
+29.7%
A4-7300 1529

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N3450 244
A4-7300 349
+43%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N3450 674
+21.2%
A4-7300 556

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.25 0.96
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.97
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron N3450 has a 30.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

A4-7300, on the other hand, has 26% faster integrated GPU.

The Celeron N3450 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-7300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3450 is a notebook processor while A4-7300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3450 and A4-7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3450
Celeron N3450
AMD A4-7300
A4-7300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 152 votes

Rate Celeron N3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 98 votes

Rate A4-7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3450 or A4-7300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.