EPYC 7773X vs Celeron N3350

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3350
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.70
EPYC 7773X
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
57.60
+8129%

EPYC 7773X outperforms Celeron N3350 by a whopping 8129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3350 and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking270722
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency11.0419.47
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Milan-X (2022)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$24no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3350 and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier11no data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3350 and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1296SP3
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350 and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N3350 and EPYC 7773X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350 and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350 and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3350 and EPYC 7773X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3350 and EPYC 7773X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350 and EPYC 7773X.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes6128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3350 0.70
EPYC 7773X 57.60
+8129%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3350 1107
EPYC 7773X 91491
+8165%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N3350 252
EPYC 7773X 1531
+508%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N3350 418
EPYC 7773X 15277
+3555%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 57.60
Recency 30 August 2016 22 March 2022
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron N3350 has 4566.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7773X, on the other hand, has a 8128.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3350 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7773X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350 and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350
AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 956 votes

Rate Celeron N3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3350 or EPYC 7773X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.