Athlon 64 X2 5200+ vs Celeron N3350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3350
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.72
+30.9%

Celeron N3350 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5200+ by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3350 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25972736
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.54
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Windsor (2006−2009)
Release date1 September 2016 (7 years ago)September 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$24no data
Current price$251 (10.5x MSRP)$111

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3350 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache2 MB512K
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data220 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3350 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1296AM2
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
StatusLaunchedno data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3350 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3350 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3350 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3350 0.72
+30.9%
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 0.55

Celeron N3350 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5200+ by 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N3350 1107
+31.2%
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 844

Celeron N3350 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5200+ by 31% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3350 253
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 253

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3350 416
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 442
+6.3%

Athlon 64 X2 5200+ outperforms Celeron N3350 by 6% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 0.55
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 89 Watt

The Celeron N3350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5200+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3350 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Athlon 64 X2 5200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 902 votes

Rate Celeron N3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 298 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3350 or Athlon 64 X2 5200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.