EPYC 4484PX vs Celeron N3160

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3160
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.76
EPYC 4484PX
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
32.18
+4134%

EPYC 4484PX outperforms Celeron N3160 by a whopping 4134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3160 and EPYC 4484PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2660126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.26
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency17.9725.36
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3160 and EPYC 4484PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed1.6 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3160 and EPYC 4484PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1170AM5
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3160 and EPYC 4484PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N3160 and EPYC 4484PX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3160 and EPYC 4484PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3160 and EPYC 4484PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 640 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency640 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3160 and EPYC 4484PX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3160 and EPYC 4484PX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3160 and EPYC 4484PX.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes428
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3160 0.76
EPYC 4484PX 32.18
+4134%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3160 1202
EPYC 4484PX 51115
+4152%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 32.18
Integrated graphics card 0.62 1.98
Recency 15 January 2016 21 May 2024
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 120 Watt

Celeron N3160 has 1900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4484PX, on the other hand, has a 4134.2% higher aggregate performance score, 219.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4484PX is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3160 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3160 is a notebook processor while EPYC 4484PX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3160 and EPYC 4484PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3160
Celeron N3160
AMD EPYC 4484PX
EPYC 4484PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 195 votes

Rate Celeron N3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4484PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3160 or EPYC 4484PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.