EPYC 7272 vs Celeron N3060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3060 and EPYC 7272 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated422
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.57
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data12.49
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$625

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3060 and EPYC 7272 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.48 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
Multiplierno data29
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3060 and EPYC 7272 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170SP3
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3060 and EPYC 7272. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N3060 and EPYC 7272 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3060 and EPYC 7272 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3060 and EPYC 7272. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)N/A
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3060 and EPYC 7272 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3060 and EPYC 7272 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3060 and EPYC 7272.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes4128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3060 663
EPYC 7272 25161
+3695%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 January 2016 7 August 2019
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 120 Watt

Celeron N3060 has 1900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7272, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3060 and EPYC 7272. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N3060 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7272 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3060 and EPYC 7272, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3060
Celeron N3060
AMD EPYC 7272
EPYC 7272

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 793 votes

Rate Celeron N3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7272 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3060 or EPYC 7272, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.