A8 Pro-7150B vs Celeron N3060
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N3060 and A8 Pro-7150B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2379 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Kaveri |
Architecture codename | Braswell (2015−2016) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
Release date | 1 April 2015 (9 years ago) | 4 June 2014 (10 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Current price | $243 (2.3x MSRP) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N3060 and A8 Pro-7150B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.48 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 4096 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | no data | 245 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 2410 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N3060 and A8 Pro-7150B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCBGA1170 | FP3 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 19 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3060 and A8 Pro-7150B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controller |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | no data | + |
AVX | no data | + |
FRTC | no data | 1 |
PowerTune | no data | - |
TrueAudio | no data | + |
PowerNow | no data | + |
PowerGating | no data | + |
Out-of-band client management | no data | + |
VirusProtect | no data | + |
RAID | no data | + |
HSA | no data | 1 |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
SIPP | - | no data |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Smart Connect | - | no data |
Status | Launched | no data |
HD Audio | + | no data |
RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N3060 and A8 Pro-7150B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Boot | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | no data |
OS Guard | - | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3060 and A8 Pro-7150B are enumerated here.
AMD-V | no data | 1 |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
VT-i | - | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
IOMMU 2.0 | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3060 and A8 Pro-7150B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-1600 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
iGPU core count | no data | 6 |
Number of pipelines | no data | 384 |
Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | no data |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Enduro | no data | + |
Switchable graphics | no data | 1 |
UVD | no data | + |
VCE | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3060 and A8 Pro-7150B integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | + |
HDMI | + | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N3060 and A8 Pro-7150B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | + | DirectX® 12 |
OpenGL | + | no data |
Vulkan | no data | 1 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3060 and A8 Pro-7150B.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
A8 Pro-7150B outperforms Celeron N3060 by 131% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 April 2015 | 4 June 2014 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 19 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron N3060 and A8 Pro-7150B. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3060 and A8 Pro-7150B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.