Celeron M 380 vs N3050
Aggregate performance score
Celeron N3050 outperforms Celeron M 380 by a whopping 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N3050 and Celeron M 380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3041 | 3284 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 5.83 | 0.77 |
| Architecture codename | Braswell (2015−2016) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 1 April 2015 (9 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N3050 and Celeron M 380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | IDI | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N3050 and Celeron M 380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3050 and Celeron M 380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| GPIO | + | no data |
| Smart Connect | - | no data |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| HD Audio | + | no data |
| RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N3050 and Celeron M 380 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Boot | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| OS Guard | - | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3050 and Celeron M 380 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | - |
| VT-i | - | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3050 and Celeron M 380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series | no data |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 600 MHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3050 and Celeron M 380 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N3050 and Celeron M 380 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | + | no data |
| OpenGL | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3050 and Celeron M 380.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | - | no data |
| UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.37 | 0.17 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 21 Watt |
Celeron N3050 has a 117.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.
The Celeron N3050 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 380 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3050 and Celeron M 380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
