Xeon W-11955M vs Celeron N3000

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3000
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.39
Xeon W-11955M
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.16
+3531%

Xeon W-11955M outperforms Celeron N3000 by a whopping 3531% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3000 and Xeon W-11955M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3015516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.58
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency9.2338.31
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Tiger Lake-H (2021)
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$623

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3000 and Xeon W-11955M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.04 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.08 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die sizeno data190 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3000 and Xeon W-11955M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1787
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3000 and Xeon W-11955M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N3000 and Xeon W-11955M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGXno data-
OS Guard-+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3000 and Xeon W-11955M are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3000 and Xeon W-11955M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency600 MHz1.45 GHz
Execution Units1232

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3000 and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N3000 and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3000 and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+12.1
OpenGL+4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3000 and Xeon W-11955M.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes420
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3000 0.39
Xeon W-11955M 14.16
+3531%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3000 626
Xeon W-11955M 22493
+3493%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N3000 151
Xeon W-11955M 2055
+1261%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N3000 264
Xeon W-11955M 8872
+3261%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.39 14.16
Integrated graphics card 0.77 5.58
Recency 1 April 2015 11 May 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron N3000 has 775% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-11955M, on the other hand, has a 3530.8% higher aggregate performance score, 624.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-11955M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3000 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-11955M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3000 and Xeon W-11955M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3000
Celeron N3000
Intel Xeon W-11955M
Xeon W-11955M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 22 votes

Rate Celeron N3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 24 votes

Rate Xeon W-11955M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3000 or Xeon W-11955M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.