Ryzen 9 3900X vs Celeron N3000

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3000
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.39
Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
20.53
+5164%

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Celeron N3000 by a whopping 5164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3015275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.73
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency9.2215.53
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed1.04 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.08 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170AM4
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series-
Max video memory8 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency600 MHz-
Execution Units12-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+-
OpenGL+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3000 0.39
Ryzen 9 3900X 20.53
+5164%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3000 626
Ryzen 9 3900X 32612
+5110%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N3000 151
Ryzen 9 3900X 1710
+1032%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N3000 264
Ryzen 9 3900X 9939
+3665%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.39 20.53
Recency 1 April 2015 7 July 2019
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron N3000 has 3025% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 3900X, on the other hand, has a 5164.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 3900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3000 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3000 and Ryzen 9 3900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3000
Celeron N3000
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 22 votes

Rate Celeron N3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5169 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3000 or Ryzen 9 3900X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.