Atom C3958 vs Celeron N3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3000 and Atom C3958 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1715
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.67
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3000 and Atom C3958 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.04 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.08 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
Multiplierno data20
L1 cacheno data896 KB
L2 cache1 MB16 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3000 and Atom C3958 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3000 and Atom C3958. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3000 and Atom C3958 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Boot++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGXno data-
OS Guard-+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3000 and Atom C3958 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3000 and Atom C3958. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 2400
Maximum memory size8 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 Seriesno data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3000 and Atom C3958 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3000 and Atom C3958 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3000 and Atom C3958.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanes416
USB revision2.0/3.03
Total number of SATA ports216
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports216
Number of USB ports58
Integrated LAN-4x10/2.5/1 GBE
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3000 616
Atom C3958 3929
+538%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 15 August 2017
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 16
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 31 Watt

Celeron N3000 has 675% lower power consumption.

Atom C3958, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3000 and Atom C3958. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N3000 is a notebook processor while Atom C3958 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3000 and Atom C3958, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3000
Celeron N3000
Intel Atom C3958
Atom C3958

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 21 vote

Rate Celeron N3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 votes

Rate Atom C3958 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3000 or Atom C3958, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.