Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS vs Celeron N2930

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2930 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2752	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	8.60	no data
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
Release date	23 February 2014 (10 years ago)	19 April 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2930 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads	4	12
Base clock speed	1.83 GHz	3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.16 GHz	4.5 GHz
L1 cache	56K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	0 KB	16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	6 nm
Die size	no data	208 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	95 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2930 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	FP7
Power consumption (TDP)	7.5 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2930 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI	-	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Smart Connect	+	no data
RST	-	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron N2930 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2930 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2930 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR5
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series	AMD Radeon 660M
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Graphics max frequency	854 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2930 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2930 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS.

PCIe version	2.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	4	20
USB revision	3.0 and 2.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	5	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	23 February 2014	19 April 2022
Physical cores	4	6
Threads	4	12
Chip lithography	22 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	7 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2930 and Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---