Celeron 560 vs N2840

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2840 and Celeron 560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)no data
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2840 and Celeron 560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speed2.16 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHzno data
L1 cache56K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2840 and Celeron 560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1170PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2840 and Celeron 560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Smart Connect+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron N2840 and Celeron 560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2840 and Celeron 560 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2840 and Celeron 560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.32 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2840 and Celeron 560 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2840 and Celeron 560.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2840 587
+73.2%
Celeron 560 339

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N2840 178
Celeron 560 238
+33.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N2840 297
+27.5%
Celeron 560 233

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2014 1 January 2008
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 31 Watt

Celeron N2840 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 342.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2840 and Celeron 560. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2840 and Celeron 560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840
Intel Celeron 560
Celeron 560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 650 votes

Rate Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 15 votes

Rate Celeron 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2840 or Celeron 560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.