i7-13700H vs Celeron N2830

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2830 and Core i7-13700H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated371
Place by popularitynot in top-10095
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Raptor Lake-H
Power efficiencyno data35.90
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Raptor Lake-H (2023)
Release date23 February 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$502

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2830 and Core i7-13700H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed2.16 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2830 and Core i7-13700H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2830 and Core i7-13700H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Connect+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N2830 and Core i7-13700H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2830 and Core i7-13700H are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2830 and Core i7-13700H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1.5 GHz
Execution Unitsno data96

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2830 and Core i7-13700H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N2830 and Core i7-13700H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N2830 and Core i7-13700H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2830 and Core i7-13700H.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes48
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2830 548
i7-13700H 27108
+4847%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N2830 1185
i7-13700H 10487
+785%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron N2830 2240
i7-13700H 65623
+2830%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron N2830 1
i7-13700H 34
+4024%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N2830 67
i7-13700H 2506
+3640%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N2830 38
i7-13700H 269
+608%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Celeron N2830 0.43
i7-13700H 3.28
+663%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2014 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 2 20
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron N2830 has 542.9% lower power consumption.

i7-13700H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and 600% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2830 and Core i7-13700H. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2830 and Core i7-13700H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2830
Celeron N2830
Intel Core i7-13700H
Core i7-13700H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 238 votes

Rate Celeron N2830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 892 votes

Rate Core i7-13700H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2830 or Core i7-13700H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.