Athlon 700 vs Celeron N2830
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N2830 and Athlon 700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3055 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Power efficiency | 4.60 | no data |
Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Thunderbird (1999−2000) |
Release date | 23 February 2014 (10 years ago) | 29 November 1999 (24 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $849 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N2830 and Athlon 700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.16 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 0.7 GHz |
L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 180 nm |
Die size | no data | 102 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 22 million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N2830 and Athlon 700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1170 | A |
Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 34 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2830 and Athlon 700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Smart Connect | + | no data |
RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N2830 and Athlon 700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2830 and Athlon 700 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2830 and Athlon 700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series | N/A |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2830 and Athlon 700 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2830 and Athlon 700.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 23 February 2014 | 29 November 1999 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 180 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 34 Watt |
Celeron N2830 has an age advantage of 14 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 718.2% more advanced lithography process, and 385.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N2830 and Athlon 700. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron N2830 is a notebook processor while Athlon 700 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2830 and Athlon 700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.