Core Ultra 9 185H vs Celeron N2820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2820 and Core Ultra 9 185H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Meteor Lake-H
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Meteor Lake-H
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$215 (2x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2820 and Core Ultra 9 185H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads222
Base clock speed2.13 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.39 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2820 and Core Ultra 9 185H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2820 and Core Ultra 9 185H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPPno data+
Smart Connect+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2820 and Core Ultra 9 185H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2820 and Core Ultra 9 185H are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2820 and Core Ultra 9 185H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel® Arc™ graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency756 MHz2.35 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2820 and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N2820 and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N2820 and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2820 and Core Ultra 9 185H.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes428
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N2820 502
Ultra 9 185H 28627
+5603%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Celeron N2820 by 5603% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N2820 198
Ultra 9 185H 2252
+1037%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Celeron N2820 by 1037% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N2820 343
Ultra 9 185H 12117
+3433%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Celeron N2820 by 3433% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron N2820 1061
Ultra 9 185H 10300
+871%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Celeron N2820 by 871% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N2820 2010
Ultra 9 185H 59935
+2882%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Celeron N2820 by 2882% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N2820 1418
Ultra 9 185H 11420
+705%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Celeron N2820 by 705% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron N2820 48.5
Ultra 9 185H 5.68
+754%

Celeron N2820 outperforms Core Ultra 9 185H by 754% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron N2820 1
Ultra 9 185H 34
+4820%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Celeron N2820 by 4820% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron N2820 58
Ultra 9 185H 2746
+4634%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Celeron N2820 by 4634% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron N2820 38
Ultra 9 185H 268
+607%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Celeron N2820 by 607% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Celeron N2820 0.36
Ultra 9 185H 3.27
+808%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Celeron N2820 by 808% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N2820 0.1
Ultra 9 185H 9.6
+7285%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Celeron N2820 by 7285% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N2820 675
Ultra 9 185H 12898
+1811%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Celeron N2820 by 1811% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N2820 6
Ultra 9 185H 158
+2628%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Celeron N2820 by 2628% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N2820 27
Ultra 9 185H 336
+1166%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Celeron N2820 by 1166% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2013 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 22
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 45 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2820 and Core Ultra 9 185H. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2820 and Core Ultra 9 185H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2820
Celeron N2820
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Core Ultra 9 185H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 39 votes

Rate Celeron N2820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 159 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 185H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2820 or Core Ultra 9 185H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.