EPYC 9455 vs Celeron N2810

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2810 and EPYC 9455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3181not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency3.24no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Turin (2024)
Release date11 September 2013 (11 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$260$5,412

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2810 and EPYC 9455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads296
Base clock speed2 GHz3.15 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB192 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data6x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data49,890 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2810 and EPYC 9455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1170SP5
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2810 and EPYC 9455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N2810 and EPYC 9455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2810 and EPYC 9455 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2810 and EPYC 9455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesN/A
Graphics max frequency756 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2810 and EPYC 9455 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2810 and EPYC 9455.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes4128
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2013 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 2 96
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 300 Watt

Celeron N2810 has 4185.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9455, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2810 and EPYC 9455. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N2810 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9455 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2810 and EPYC 9455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2810
Celeron N2810
AMD EPYC 9455
EPYC 9455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 41 vote

Rate Celeron N2810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2810 or EPYC 9455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.