Xeon D-1627 vs Celeron N2808
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Xeon D |
Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
Release date | 22 May 2014 (10 years ago) | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $202 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 1.58 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.25 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
Multiplier | no data | 29 |
L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | no data | 246.24 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 3200 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1667 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
QuickAssist | no data | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | + | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
GPIO | no data | + |
Smart Connect | + | no data |
AMT | no data | SPS 3.0 |
Quiet System | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | + | + |
SGX | no data | - |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 10.66 GB/s | 34.124 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 792 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | 32 |
USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | 6 |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 6 |
Number of USB ports | 5 | 8 |
Integrated LAN | no data | 4x 10 GBE |
UART | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 22 May 2014 | 2 April 2019 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron N2808 has 1025% lower power consumption.
Xeon D-1627, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron N2808 is a notebook processor while Xeon D-1627 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.