Xeon D-1627 vs Celeron N2808

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Xeon D
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$202

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.58 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.25 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache56K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB6 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
GPIOno data+
Smart Connect+no data
AMTno dataSPS 3.0
Quiet Systemno data-

Security technologies

Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Key++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory size4 GB128 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth10.66 GB/s34.124 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627.

PCIe version2.02.0/3.0
PCI Express lanes432
USB revision3.0 and 2.02.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports26
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data6
Number of USB ports58
Integrated LANno data4x 10 GBE
UARTno data+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2014 2 April 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron N2808 has 1025% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-1627, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N2808 is a notebook processor while Xeon D-1627 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2808 and Xeon D-1627, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2808
Celeron N2808
Intel Xeon D-1627
Xeon D-1627

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 42 votes

Rate Celeron N2808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1627 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2808 or Xeon D-1627, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.