Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U vs Celeron N2808

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated915
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)19 April 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.58 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.25 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FP6
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth10.66 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes48
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N2808 510
Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U 11381
+2132%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U outperforms Celeron N2808 by 2132% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2014 19 April 2022
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2808
Celeron N2808
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 41 vote

Rate Celeron N2808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2808 or Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.