Celeron 827 vs N2808

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.58 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.25 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data14
L1 cache56K (per core)64 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)256 KB
L3 cache0 KB1.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170no data
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size4 GB16 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth10.66 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron N2808 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 325% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2808
Celeron N2808
Intel Celeron 827
Celeron 827

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 42 votes

Rate Celeron N2808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 827 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2808 or Celeron 827, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.