Ultra 5 245KF vs Celeron N2806

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2806
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.31
Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.68
+8829%

Core Ultra 5 245KF outperforms Celeron N2806 by a whopping 8829% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2806 and Core Ultra 5 245KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3108176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data82.60
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency7.3320.96
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 December 2013 (11 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2806 and Core Ultra 5 245KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data8
Threads214
Base clock speed1.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2806 and Core Ultra 5 245KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2806 and Core Ultra 5 245KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron N2806 and Core Ultra 5 245KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2806 and Core Ultra 5 245KF are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2806 and Core Ultra 5 245KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size4 GB192 GB
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesN/A
Graphics max frequency756 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2806 and Core Ultra 5 245KF integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2806 and Core Ultra 5 245KF.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes420
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2806 0.31
Ultra 5 245KF 27.68
+8829%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2806 489
Ultra 5 245KF 43973
+8892%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 27.68
Recency 1 December 2013 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 2 14
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron N2806 has 3025% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 245KF, on the other hand, has a 8829% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 245KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2806 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N2806 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 245KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2806 and Core Ultra 5 245KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2806
Celeron N2806
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Core Ultra 5 245KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 28 votes

Rate Celeron N2806 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2806 or Core Ultra 5 245KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.