Ryzen 5 8640HS vs Celeron M ULV 722

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 8640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated600
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiencyno data43.47
Architecture codenameno dataHawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date1 July 2008 (16 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 8640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data6 (Hexa-Core)
Threadsno data12
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.775V - 1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 8640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956FP8
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 8640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 8640HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 8640HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 8640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 8640HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2008 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron M ULV 722 has 460% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 8640HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 8640HS. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 8640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M ULV 722
Celeron M ULV 722
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
Ryzen 5 8640HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M ULV 722 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 63 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8640HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M ULV 722 or Ryzen 5 8640HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.