Ryzen 5 5500 vs Celeron M ULV 722
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 5500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 626 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 1 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 48.98 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | no data | 17.78 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Cezanne (2021−2024) |
| Release date | 1 July 2008 (16 years ago) | 4 April 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $159 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 5500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.775V - 1.1V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 5500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA956 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 5500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 5500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 5500 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 5500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 5500.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2008 | 4 April 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron M ULV 722 has 1200% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 5500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 5500. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M ULV 722 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 5500 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M ULV 722 and Ryzen 5 5500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
