i9-13900F vs Celeron M ULV 722
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 199 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 55.69 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | no data | 18.18 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 1 July 2008 (17 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $524 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron M ULV 722 and Core i9-13900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 8 |
| Efficient-cores | no data | 16 |
| Threads | no data | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 5.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 36 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.775V - 1.1V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M ULV 722 and Core i9-13900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA956 | FCLGA1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Core i9-13900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M ULV 722 and Core i9-13900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Core i9-13900F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | - | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Core i9-13900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 89.6 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Core i9-13900F.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2008 | 4 January 2023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron M ULV 722 has 1200% lower power consumption.
i9-13900F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M ULV 722 and Intel Core i9-13900F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M ULV 722 is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900F is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
