Apple M1 vs Celeron M ULV 722

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M ULV 722 and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Release date1 July 2008 (16 years ago)10 November 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M ULV 722 and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data8 (Octa-Core)
Threadsno data8
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data2 MB
L2 cacheno data16 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache16 MB
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.775V - 1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M ULV 722 and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956no data
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M ULV 722 and Apple M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M ULV 722 and Apple M1 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2008 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M ULV 722 and Apple M1. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M ULV 722 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M ULV 722
Celeron M ULV 722
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M ULV 722 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2212 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M ULV 722 or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.