Celeron M 763 vs M U3600

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M U3600 and Celeron M 763 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date18 December 2010 (13 years ago)1 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3600 and Celeron M 763 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size81+114 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3600 and Celeron M 763 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA1288BGA965
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3600 and Celeron M 763. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron M U3600 and Celeron M 763 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3600 and Celeron M 763 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3600 and Celeron M 763. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron M U3600 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 763, on the other hand, has 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M U3600 and Celeron M 763. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3600 and Celeron M 763, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M U3600
Celeron M U3600
Intel Celeron M 763
Celeron M 763

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M 763 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M U3600 or Celeron M 763, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.