Pentium E6500K vs Celeron M U3400
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M U3400 and Pentium E6500K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 24 May 2010 (13 years ago) | August 2009 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M U3400 and Pentium E6500K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.93 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.06 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| Bus support | 2500 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 82 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 228 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V – 1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M U3400 and Pentium E6500K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1288 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Pentium E6500K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Celeron M U3400 and Pentium E6500K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and Pentium E6500K are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and Pentium E6500K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron M U3400 and Pentium E6500K. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M U3400 is a notebook processor while Pentium E6500K is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3400 and Pentium E6500K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
