Ultra 5 225F vs Celeron M U3400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M U3400 and Core Ultra 5 225F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3117not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Power efficiency1.52no data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3400 and Core Ultra 5 225F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads210
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.06 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB21 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size81+114 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3400 and Core Ultra 5 225F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA12881851
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and Core Ultra 5 225F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron M U3400 and Core Ultra 5 225F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and Core Ultra 5 225F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and Core Ultra 5 225F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M U3400 and Core Ultra 5 225F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 10
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron M U3400 has 261.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 225F, on the other hand, has 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M U3400 and Core Ultra 5 225F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M U3400 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 225F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3400 and Core Ultra 5 225F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
Core Ultra 5 225F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra 5 225F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M U3400 or Core Ultra 5 225F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.