Xeon Gold 6442Y vs Celeron M P4600
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 6442Y outperforms Celeron M P4600 by a whopping 6408% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3105 | 138 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 17.48 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.62 | 6.27 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 1 October 2010 (15 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $2,065 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron M P4600 and Xeon Gold 6442Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 60 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 79 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4600 and Xeon Gold 6442Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | PGA988 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Xeon Gold 6442Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M P4600 and Xeon Gold 6442Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Xeon Gold 6442Y are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M P4600 and Xeon Gold 6442Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M P4600 and Xeon Gold 6442Y.
| PCIe version | no data | 5 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.51 | 33.19 |
| Recency | 1 October 2010 | 10 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
| Threads | 2 | 48 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
Celeron M P4600 has 542.9% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6442Y, on the other hand, has a 6407.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.
The Intel Xeon Gold 6442Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M P4600 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron M P4600 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6442Y is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
