Opteron X2 875 vs Celeron M P4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2799not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Power efficiency1.51no data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Egypt (2005−2006)
Release date1 October 2010 (14 years ago)September 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million233 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data8
SocketPGA988940
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron M P4600 has a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M P4600 is a notebook processor while Opteron X2 875 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and Opteron X2 875, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4600
Celeron M P4600
AMD Opteron X2 875
Opteron X2 875

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron M P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X2 875 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4600 or Opteron X2 875, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.