EPYC 9334 vs Celeron M P4600
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9334 outperforms Celeron M P4600 by a whopping 7077% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3000 | 78 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 11.74 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 1.54 | 18.46 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 1 October 2010 (14 years ago) | 10 November 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $2,990 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9334 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 27 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 4x 72 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 52,560 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | PGA988 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 210 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9334 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9334 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 460.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9334.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.56 | 40.19 |
| Recency | 1 October 2010 | 10 November 2022 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 32 |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 210 Watt |
Celeron M P4600 has 500% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9334, on the other hand, has a 7076.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 9334 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M P4600 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron M P4600 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9334 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
