Xeon Gold 5318N vs Celeron M 925
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 925 and Xeon Gold 5318N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | 1 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 925 and Xeon Gold 5318N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 36 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 83 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 925 and Xeon Gold 5318N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | PGA478 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 925 and Xeon Gold 5318N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 925 and Xeon Gold 5318N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 925 and Xeon Gold 5318N are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 925 and Xeon Gold 5318N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2667 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 925 and Xeon Gold 5318N.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2011 | 6 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 150 Watt |
Celeron M 925 has 328.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5318N, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 925 and Xeon Gold 5318N. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 925 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5318N is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 925 and Xeon Gold 5318N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
