5 220H vs Celeron M 925
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 925 and Core 5 220H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 1 January 2011 (14 years ago) | 18 December 2024 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | $342 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 925 and Core 5 220H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 18 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 925 and Core 5 220H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PGA478 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 925 and Core 5 220H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 925 and Core 5 220H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 925 and Core 5 220H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 925 and Core 5 220H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 925 and Core 5 220H.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2011 | 18 December 2024 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron M 925 has 28.6% lower power consumption.
5 220H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 925 and Core 5 220H. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 925 and Core 5 220H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
