Athlon X4 760K vs Celeron M 743

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1973
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Power efficiencyno data1.77
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB192K
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors410 Million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA965FM2
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1866

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 1 June 2013
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 100 Watt

Celeron M 743 has 900% lower power consumption.

Athlon X4 760K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 743 is a notebook processor while Athlon X4 760K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 743
Celeron M 743
AMD Athlon X4 760K
Athlon X4 760K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 23 votes

Rate Celeron M 743 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 248 votes

Rate Athlon X4 760K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 743 or Athlon X4 760K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.