Athlon X4 760K vs Celeron M 743
Aggregate performance score
Athlon X4 760K outperforms Celeron M 743 by a whopping 1107% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3605 | 2263 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.81 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Richland (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (16 years ago) | 1 June 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 192K |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 1,303 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA965 | FM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 MB | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3-1866 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 743 and Athlon X4 760K.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.14 | 1.69 |
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 1 June 2013 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 Watt | 100 Watt |
Celeron M 743 has 9900% lower power consumption.
Athlon X4 760K, on the other hand, has a 1107.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Athlon X4 760K is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 743 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron M 743 is a notebook processor while Athlon X4 760K is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
