Ryzen Embedded 7645 vs Celeron M 722
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 1 October 2008 (17 years ago) | 14 November 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 722 and Ryzen Embedded 7645 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 71 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 6,570 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 722 and Ryzen Embedded 7645 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | VGA956 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 722 and Ryzen Embedded 7645. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 722 and Ryzen Embedded 7645 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 722 and Ryzen Embedded 7645. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 722 and Ryzen Embedded 7645.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2008 | 14 November 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron M 722 has 1200% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Embedded 7645, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 722 and AMD Ryzen Embedded 7645. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 722 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Embedded 7645 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
