Ultra 9 285T vs Celeron M 630 MHz

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 630 MHz and Core Ultra 9 285T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Architecture codenameno dataArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 630 MHz and Core Ultra 9 285T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speedno data1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed0.63 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 630 MHz and Core Ultra 9 285T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data1851
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 630 MHz and Core Ultra 9 285T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 630 MHz and Core Ultra 9 285T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 630 MHz and Core Ultra 9 285T are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 630 MHz and Core Ultra 9 285T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 630 MHz and Core Ultra 9 285T.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 24
Threads 1 24
Chip lithography 90 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron M 630 MHz has 600% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285T, on the other hand, has 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 630 MHz and Core Ultra 9 285T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 630 MHz is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 630 MHz and Core Ultra 9 285T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 630 MHz
Celeron M 630 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T
Core Ultra 9 285T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Celeron M 630 MHz on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 630 MHz or Core Ultra 9 285T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.