Turion 64 X2 TL-50 vs Celeron M 585
Aggregate performance score
Celeron M 585 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-50 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3241 | 3341 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.01 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | 2x AMD Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 0.52 | 0.41 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Taylor (2006) |
| Release date | 20 August 2008 (17 years ago) | 17 May 2006 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | $154 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 585 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 147 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 154 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 585 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 585 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | SSE(1,2,3), AMD64 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.38 | 0.30 |
| Recency | 20 August 2008 | 17 May 2006 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Celeron M 585 has a 26.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 X2 TL-50, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
The Intel Celeron M 585 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-50 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
