Processor 300T vs Celeron M 585
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 585 and Processor 300T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2979 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.29 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 20 August 2008 (16 years ago) | 8 January 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | $82 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 585 and Processor 300T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 163 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 585 and Processor 300T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 585 and Processor 300T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 585 and Processor 300T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 585 and Processor 300T are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 585 and Processor 300T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 585 and Processor 300T.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 August 2008 | 8 January 2024 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron M 585 has 12.9% lower power consumption.
Processor 300T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 585 and Processor 300T. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 585 is a notebook processor while Processor 300T is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 585 and Processor 300T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
