EPYC Embedded 8434P vs Celeron M 585

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 585 and EPYC Embedded 8434P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2973not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Power efficiency1.31no data
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 585 and EPYC Embedded 8434P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads196
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm5 nm
Die size143 mm24x 73 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors291 Million35,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 585 and EPYC Embedded 8434P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478SP6
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 585 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 585 and EPYC Embedded 8434P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 585 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 585 and EPYC Embedded 8434P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 August 2008 1 October 2024
Physical cores 1 48
Threads 1 96
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 200 Watt

Celeron M 585 has 545.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 8434P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 585 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 585 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 8434P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 585 and EPYC Embedded 8434P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 585
Celeron M 585
AMD EPYC Embedded 8434P
EPYC Embedded 8434P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M 585 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8434P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 585 or EPYC Embedded 8434P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.