Core 3 100HL vs Celeron M 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 560 and Core 3 100HL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 560 and Core 3 100HL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm10 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 560 and Core 3 100HL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA4781700
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 560 and Core 3 100HL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 560 and Core 3 100HL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 560 and Core 3 100HL are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 560 and Core 3 100HL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIris Xe Graphics 48EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 560 and Core 3 100HL.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2008 8 April 2024
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron M 560 has 50% lower power consumption.

3 100HL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 700% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 560 and Core 3 100HL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 560 is a notebook processor while Core 3 100HL is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 560 and Core 3 100HL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 560
Celeron M 560
Intel Core 3 100HL
Core 3 100HL

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron M 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 3 100HL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 560 or Core 3 100HL, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.