Ultra 5 245K vs Celeron M 430

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 430
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.11
Core Ultra 5 245K
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 125 Watt
27.70
+25082%

Core Ultra 5 245K outperforms Celeron M 430 by a whopping 25082% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 430 and Core Ultra 5 245K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3377174
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data78.64
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiency0.3920.97
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateno data24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 430 and Core Ultra 5 245K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads114
Base clock speed1.73 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.73 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz159 MHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data3 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 430 and Core Ultra 5 245K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA4781851
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 430 and Core Ultra 5 245K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 430 and Core Ultra 5 245K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 430 and Core Ultra 5 245K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 430 and Core Ultra 5 245K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 430 and Core Ultra 5 245K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 430 0.11
Ultra 5 245K 27.70
+25082%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 430 169
Ultra 5 245K 44006
+25939%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 27.70
Physical cores 1 14
Threads 1 14
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron M 430 has 363% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 245K, on the other hand, has a 25081.8% higher aggregate performance score, 1300% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 5 245K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 430 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M 430 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 245K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 430 and Core Ultra 5 245K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 430
Celeron M 430
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Core Ultra 5 245K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 27 votes

Rate Celeron M 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 25 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 430 or Core Ultra 5 245K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.