Celeron N5095A vs M 430
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 430 and Celeron N5095A processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1673 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Celeron M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Yonah (2005−2006) | no data |
| Release date | no data | 1 July 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 430 and Celeron N5095A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | no data |
| Bus support | 533 MHz | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 430 and Celeron N5095A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 15 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 430 and Celeron N5095A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 430 and Celeron N5095A.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 15 Watt |
Celeron N5095A has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 80% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 430 and Celeron N5095A. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 430 is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095A is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 430 and Celeron N5095A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
