Ultra 7 265 vs Celeron M 410

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 410 and Core Ultra 7 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	3401	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Celeron M	no data
Power efficiency	0.28	no data
Architecture codename	Yonah (2005−2006)	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date	no data	January 2025

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 410 and Core Ultra 7 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads	1	20
Base clock speed	1.46 GHz	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.46 GHz	5.3 GHz
Bus rate	533 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	112 KB (per core)
L2 cache	no data	3 MB (per core)
L3 cache	1 MB L2 KB	30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	65 nm	3 nm
Die size	no data	243 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	17,800 million
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
VID voltage range	1.0V-1.3V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 410 and Core Ultra 7 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	PPGA478	1851
Power consumption (TDP)	27 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 410 and Core Ultra 7 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
TSX	-	+
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 410 and Core Ultra 7 265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 410 and Core Ultra 7 265 are enumerated here.

VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	-	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 410 and Core Ultra 7 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 410 and Core Ultra 7 265.

PCIe version	no data	5.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	20

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	1	20
Threads	1	20
Chip lithography	65 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	27 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 410 and Core Ultra 7 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---