Atom C3750 vs Celeron M 410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3648not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCeleron MIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.11no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release dateno data15 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$171

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 410 and Atom C3750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed1.46 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
Multiplierno data22
L1 cacheno data448 KB
L2 cacheno data16 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 KB16 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C84 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 410 and Atom C3750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPPGA478FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 410 and Atom C3750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 410 and Atom C3750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 410 and Atom C3750 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 410 and Atom C3750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4: 2400
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 410 and Atom C3750.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data12
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data12
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data2x10/2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 21 Watt

Atom C3750 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 410 and Intel Atom C3750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 410 is a notebook processor while Atom C3750 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 410
Celeron M 410
Intel Atom C3750
Atom C3750

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 12 votes

Rate Celeron M 410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron M 410 and Atom C3750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.